Monday, July 6, 2015

How my writing is like my gardening

GARDENING:

We all know people - or maybe you are one of those people - who have a beautiful yard. A showplace!

I don't.

We know people who have hired a landscaper or a designer, or maybe they just have a really good eye for where a nice flowering shrub should go.

That's not me.

Add to that that I have always been careful with my water use here in semi-arid Inland Valley California and... well, crab grass doesn't take much water, but we were trying to keep the lawn greenish. In fact, my kids prefer the grass the last couple of years, because watered crab grass sends up tall flower/seed shoots and needs to be mowed. Unwatered crab grass that takes advantage of the water for the trees needs to be mowed rarely and in small patches. If my mower were powered by complaints, we'd be golden.

Oh, and we rent - we've been in this house for eleven years - and aren't going to be making any huge changes.

So stack a bad drought on top of that, and my yard is... ah, less than a showplace.



When we moved in here, I got the owner's permission to get free shade trees from the electric company. Then I got his permission to put in deer grass (those tufty things to the right). We also planted a live Christmas tree to help the scoliosis-ridden Japanese maple shade the front window. It fell over in a windstorm a couple of years later and we used cables to hold it up. The cables rusted through after a few years and the tree is at an interesting, somewhat intimidating angle.

My woodland glen right outside the front window.


I put in low-water, low-maintenance shrubs out back and promptly killed all but one (but it's gorgeous in the spring). I put one of the same type in the front and it took me a few years to kill it (it never looked all that great, even in spring).

Today, I was buying an exacto knife at the hardware store and spotted the bags of bark mulch, so bought six. And had to go back for six more. I've been meaning to mulch the trees for over a year. Now I have. I didn't remove the grass or cover it with plastic or anything, I just dumped bark mulch and raked it around.

My landscaping has been done - dare I say it? - organically. Not that it's organic, just that it has grown up over the years, been neglected, fixed, added to, subtracted, hacked back, and yet somehow it works. I'd like to mulch the whole thing and put in more tufty and flowering plants, but would need a dump truck full of mulch and a way to keep the mulch from rolling down the hill. And a bigger budget. And more time.

WRITING: 

We all know novelists who write amazing books, chef d'oeuvres, every time.

I don't.

We all know someone - at least most novelists know someone - who plans out every aspect of their books. They plot, they draw character arcs, they diagram the subplot in a different color, they brainstorm the childhood of all of their characters. Their characters do as they're told. No one demands to be heard unless s/he's supposed to be talking. When they finish a first draft, sure, the thing needs edits, but the bones are all there and the major plot points hit at the most effective moments.

That's not me.

Like a huge subset of authors, I fall somewhere on the spectrum of "plotters" and "pantsers".  Since I write romance, I know how the story ends: Happily Ever After. That's about it.

Early on as I write everything that comes to mind about what should happen at the beginning of the book and where it might go later, I tend to think of some future scenes: how about a duel? A forced wedding? And there definitely needs to be a big, chaotic fight scene! Oh, and they can go horseback riding together and share a breathless kiss full of attraction/love/lust.

I have to have the rough sketch of the hero and heroine in my head, a few future plot points, and then it just happens. Well, with hours and hours of work, it happens. Things twist and turn and change and I need to delete and expand and delete and fix. And how about a secondary character with his own point of view? And ooooh I need to put in some foreshadowing of this event which totally took me by surprise!

For me, the real struggle is edits. That's also where the magic happens.

You know, I really should mulch down this scene. I need to go mow the part where he broods about his childhood. I think I should stick a nice lavender plant in over here where he plays with his nieces and nephews.

I speed up the slow parts, I make sure important stuff gets emphasized, I more or less follow a four act structure. I will MAKE it fit.

Is the metaphor strained enough?

I spend a lot more time on writing than on gardening. Though I go through writing droughts where I don't have time or energy, I certainly feed the books more than any hobby, including what my poor yard looks like.

Then I do yet another edit, this time based on my editor's comments. And then another because I had more flashes of insight. And then another and then...

Please take this book away from me, because I could pick at it forever.

Each book ends up being what it is. Not necessarily a master work, but an acceptable, interesting yard. With flowers. And mulch. And tufty things. And maybe a master work after all? Maybe if I squint at it from the right angle. I'm pretty much a debut author, though I've been writing for about eight years. It's going to take time until I reach my peak. And that's OK.

A little garden path lined by thyme....

Saturday, July 4, 2015

MURICA and France: a complicated relationship.


Just some historical ramblings here.


Do you remember the French and Indian War, as taught in American schools? Sometime just before the Revolution. The French were the bad guys, as were half of the Indians. Daniel Day Lewis with his shirt off. Atrocities. George Washington causes more problems than he solves. Um.... Let's see...


It was just one small theater of the Seven Years' War. I'm going to let Wikipedia try to explain it, but it was essentially a world war as it also involved colonies in Africa and India, along with most of Europe.

Our history books like to blame it for the American Revolution: the British government tried to get the colonies to pay taxes to pay the debt for the war. The colonists said no. The colonists also disliked the British sticking soldiers in their homes and even kicking them out because the soldiers needed to stay somewhere.

Frontenac receiving the envoy of Sir William Phipps demanding the surrender of Quebec, 1690.jpg
But then we need to step back even further: The F&I War is known by the Canadians as "The Fourth Continental War" because Britain and France had been using Canada as a part of every major war they were fighting in Europe. For about a hundred years. Since 1688 (and before). And they fought a lot of wars in Europe, which means they fought a lot of wars in North America, too.

(By the way, there will be a book in my French series in which a character is in the French Army and is being transferred to Canada. His family is freaking out. I'm thinking of giving him a romance of his own, where he gets the girl in spite of missing various limbs and suffering from PTSD.)

The French Canadians also call the French and Indian war the "War of Conquest" since France finally lost their territories to the British in 1755. The Acadians were booted out of parts of Canada and Maine and shipped off to wallow in the swamps. Their language evolved, as languages do, and now we call them Cajuns.

So anyway, fast forward a mere 20 years, and the British colonists are getting restless about taxation without representation and tyranny and soldier billeting and they decide to revolt. Well, a few of them do. Seriously, no matter how we've whitewashed the story and everyone was pro-USA and only nasty traitors supported the Brits, it was more 50/50. Or probably 20/20/60, the last 60 being the people who were just trying to stay out of the way. It cut across classes. The North tended to be more pro-independence and the South more pro-Brit. You want a Civil War? Here's a Civil War.

BACK TO THE FRENCH.

If France hadn't entered into an alliance with the rebels, we would, as a friend said today, still be speaking English.

This wasn't Revolutionary France. This wasn't Napoleon (though we sure were happy to take the Louisiana territories off his hands later). This wasn't Rights of Man, Voltaire, Montesquieu, Rousseau. This was the Ancien Régime. They were in it to mess with the British and weaken them.

They gave less than one, uh, crap about Freedom and Democracy. Yes, please, let us spend a lot of money, as eet weel peess off zee Breeteesh.

Joke's on them. Ten years on, debt, a drought, heavy taxes, stomping on the peasants, and boom. French Revolution. Who weakened whom, eh?

sans culotteNow, I read a lot of romance novels. I love me some Regency romance novels. But we seem to forget that the Americans helped Napoleon. The War of 1812 (Imma let Wikipedia do that one, too) was part of the Napoleonic Wars. The US attacked because the Brits were harassing our shipping and conscripting our sailors...as we delivered stuff to Napoleon.The British weren't just attacking American ships willy nilly.

Anyway, it's interesting that nowadays, we remember the fight against tyranny, but the British are our best buddies, while people mock the French. Truth is, it took the US a long time to get on its feet. And France is the one who got us started, even if they did it for their own reasons.

Wednesday, July 1, 2015

Nanowrimo.... in July? AND POISON!

I signed up to write 30,000 words this month in Camp Nanowrimo. I need to finish a couple of projects. I'm much more traditional about the November Nano, where I will write at least 50K words on a new project. But lately. everything revolves around editing and finishing and adding.

I've been goofing around all day and being interrupted. But I wrote 500 words which is... barely 2 pages. Right. Back to work.

I need to get my head into 1678. Here's one of Louis XIV's mistresses (though not an official one, so she got the shaft, then she got the shaft...), Claude de vin des Oeillets, companion and lady's maid to Athenais de Montespan. She a daughter with the king and he never recognized or legitimated her and gave her titles, like he did with la Valliere and Montespan. She was heavily implicated in The Affair of the Poisons, which was just starting to reach its peak frenzy in 1678. Claude went and lived a quiet life far away from court.


Claude de vin des Oeillets, companion and lady's maid to Athenais de Montespan. She was also an occasional mistress of Louis XIV
Montespan ended up being ditched by the king, who suppressed the evidence against her about the poisons and black masses and so on. We're still not sure what happened. At the very least, she was buying a love potion from the "witches" implicated in the poisonings. The potion apparently made Louis sick to his stomach, all while, Montespan hoped, it made him love her.